Read the given information and answer the question. ‘Despite spending huge amount of money, we have not yet been able to find life on other planets. I am personally of the opinion that such research should stop with immediate effect as it is a waste of time and money as no good will ever come out of it Instead it would be better to use this money to research other elements in space' Statement by a Scientist from Space Institute of Country X. Which of the following does not weaken the statement of the scientist of space institute of country X?

Question

Accepted Answer

Step 1: Understand the scientist's claim

The scientist argues that continuing the search for extraterrestrial life is a waste of time and money and therefore should be stopped.

Step 2: Interpret "does not weaken"

A choice that does not weaken the claim either supports it or is neutral; it cannot provide a reason that undermines the scientist's conclusion.

Step 3: Analyze option C

Option C states that previous projects at the institute have failed despite large expenditures. This provides evidence that spending large sums has produced no results in the past, which reinforces the scientist's judgement that such research may be wasteful and should be stopped. Therefore option C does not weaken the scientist's statement (it strengthens or supports it).

Conclusion

Because option C supports the scientist's conclusion rather than undermining it, it does not weaken the statement.

FINAL_ANSWER: c

Answer

Answer

Answer

Answer