Directions: In the sentence given below, five parts (A, B, C, D, E) are jumbled. Rearrange them to form a grammatically correct and meaningful sentence.

(A) The Delhi High Court allowed
(B) the CBI and ED’s appeal
(C) former Telecom Minister A. Raja and others
(D) for an early hearing on its leave to appeal
(E) against the 2G case verdict acquitting

Question

Directions: In the sentence given below, five parts (A, B, C, D, E) are jumbled. Rearrange them to form a grammatically correct and meaningful sentence.

(A) The Delhi High Court allowed  
(B) the CBI and ED’s appeal  
(C) former Telecom Minister A. Raja and others  
(D) for an early hearing on its leave to appeal  
(E) against the 2G case verdict acquitting

Accepted Answer

**Solution:**

1. The sentence discusses the appeal made by the CBI and ED regarding an early hearing on their leave to appeal.

2. The logical flow starts with the subject performing the action: "The Delhi High Court allowed" (A).

3. Next comes the object of the action: "the CBI and ED’s appeal" (B).

4. Then the purpose of the appeal is mentioned: "for an early hearing on its leave to appeal" (D).

5. This is followed by the context of the appeal: "against the 2G case verdict acquitting" (E).

6. Finally, the persons acquitted are stated: "former Telecom Minister A. Raja and others" (C).

Putting these parts together in the order ABDEC forms a coherent and grammatically correct sentence:

**"The Delhi High Court allowed the CBI and ED’s appeal for an early hearing on its leave to appeal against the 2G case verdict acquitting former Telecom Minister A. Raja and others."**

**Answer:** ABDEC

Answer

Answer

Answer

Answer