Consider the following statements:

I. No Sea is Marine.

II. Some Mango is Sea.

III. 100% Yatch are Marine.

Based on these statements, evaluate the following conclusions:

I. All Mango can be Yatch.

II. Some Mango is not Marine.

Which of the conclusions logically follows from the statements, assuming the statements are true even if they contradict common knowledge?

Question

Consider the following statements:

I. No Sea is Marine.

II. Some Mango is Sea.

III. 100% Yatch are Marine.

Based on these statements, evaluate the following conclusions:

I. All Mango can be Yatch.

II. Some Mango is not Marine.

Which of the conclusions logically follows from the statements, assuming the statements are true even if they contradict common knowledge?

Accepted Answer

**Solution:**

1. From statement I, "No Sea is Marine," it means there is no overlap between Sea and Marine.

2. Statement II says "Some Mango is Sea," so some Mango elements belong to Sea.

3. Statement III states "100% Yatch are Marine," meaning all Yatch are within Marine.

Now, analyze the conclusions:

- Conclusion I: "All Mango can be Yatch."
  Since all Yatch are Marine and no Sea is Marine, and some Mango are Sea, Mango and Yatch cannot overlap fully. Therefore, conclusion I does not logically follow.

- Conclusion II: "Some Mango is not Marine."
  Since some Mango are Sea and no Sea is Marine, those Mango that are Sea are definitely not Marine. Hence, conclusion II logically follows.

**Answer:** Only conclusion II follows.

Answer

Answer

Answer

Answer