In each group of questions below are two conclusions followed by some statements. You have to choose the correct set of statements that logically satisfies both the conclusions even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts:
**Conclusions:**
I. Some Dog is not Horse.
II. Some Cat can be Horse.

Question

Accepted Answer

**Solution:**

1. Analyze Conclusion I: "Some Dog is not Horse."
   - This means there exists at least one Dog that is definitely not a Horse.

2. Analyze Conclusion II: "Some Cat can be Horse."
   - This implies there is a possibility that some Cats are Horses.

3. Check each set of statements against these conclusions:

- (a) "Some Horse is Dog," "No Elephant is Horse," "Some Cat is Dog."
  - If some Horse is Dog, then all Dogs could be Horses, contradicting Conclusion I.
  - Also, no statement supports some Cat can be Horse.

- (b) "All Elephant is Cat," "All Dog is Horse," "Some Elephant is Dog."
  - "All Dog is Horse" contradicts Conclusion I, which says some Dog is not Horse.
  - Also, no direct support for some Cat can be Horse.

- (c) "All Elephant is Dog," "All Dog is Cat," "No Cat is Horse."
  - "No Cat is Horse" contradicts Conclusion II.

- (d) "No Elephant is Horse," "Some Dog is Elephant," "No Dog is Cat."
  - "Some Dog is Elephant" implies some Dogs are not Horses (since no Elephant is Horse), satisfying Conclusion I.
  - "No Dog is Cat" does not contradict Conclusion II, which only says some Cat can be Horse.
  - Since no Elephant is Horse, and some Dog is Elephant, some Dog is not Horse.
  - Also, no statement denies some Cat can be Horse, so Conclusion II can hold.

4. Therefore, option (d) is the only set of statements that logically satisfies both conclusions.

**Answer:** (d)

Answer

Answer

Answer