A company X has decided to increase the HRA allowances of its employees due to the reallocation of the company to the NCR region.

Which of the following can be inferred from the given statement?

(I) The HRA allowances directly depend on the region of living of the employee.

(II) The employees of company X are on strike due to the reallocation of the company.

(III) The profit amount of company X has increased, so it has also increased the amount of HRA of its employees.

Question

A company X has decided to increase the HRA allowances of its employees due to the reallocation of the company to the NCR region.

Which of the following can be inferred from the given statement?

(I) The HRA allowances directly depend on the region of living of the employee.

(II) The employees of company X are on strike due to the reallocation of the company.

(III) The profit amount of company X has increased, so it has also increased the amount of HRA of its employees.

Accepted Answer

**Solution:**

1. Statement (I) can be inferred because the company has increased HRA allowances specifically due to the relocation to the NCR region, indicating a direct relationship between HRA and the employee's living region.

2. Statement (II) cannot be inferred as there is no information about any strike by employees related to the relocation.

3. Statement (III) is also not supported because the increase in HRA is attributed to the relocation, not to any increase in the company's profits.

Therefore, only statement (I) logically follows from the given information.

**Answer:** (c) Only (I)

Answer

Answer

Answer

Answer