Given the statements:

- Some Kolkata are Jhansi.
- Some Delhi are Cuttack.
- No Jhansi is Cuttack.

Which of the following conclusions **does not logically follow** from the above statements?

Question

Given the statements:

- Some Kolkata are Jhansi.
- Some Delhi are Cuttack.
- No Jhansi is Cuttack.

Which of the following conclusions **does not logically follow** from the above statements?

Accepted Answer

**Solution:**

1. From the statements:
   - Some Kolkata are Jhansi.
   - Some Delhi are Cuttack.
   - No Jhansi is Cuttack.

2. Analyze each conclusion:

(a) **All Kolkata cannot be Cuttack**:
   - Since some Kolkata are Jhansi and no Jhansi is Cuttack, it is impossible for all Kolkata to be Cuttack.
   - So, this conclusion logically follows.

(b) **Some Delhi can be Jhansi**:
   - There is no direct statement denying or confirming this.
   - Since some Delhi are Cuttack and no Jhansi is Cuttack, Delhi and Jhansi may or may not overlap.
   - Hence, this conclusion can logically follow.

(c) **All Jhansi can be Delhi**:
   - The statements do not provide any information about the relation between Jhansi and Delhi.
   - However, since some Jhansi are Kolkata and some Delhi are Cuttack (which is disjoint from Jhansi), it is not necessary that all Jhansi can be Delhi.
   - This conclusion does not logically follow.

(d) **Some Jhansi are not Kolkata**:
   - Since only some Kolkata are Jhansi, it is possible that some Jhansi are not Kolkata.
   - This conclusion logically follows.

3. Therefore, the conclusion that **does not logically follow** is (c) "All Jhansi can be Delhi".

**Answer:** All Jhansi can be Delhi

Answer

Answer

Answer