Noticing how the dimensions of the bridge were different than that of others in the city, my guest asked me why the bridge was so _____________________. (a) bleak/glowing (b) opulent/faded (c) modern/pedestrian (d) wide/narrow (e) sturdy/weak

Question

Accepted Answer

**Solution:**

1. The sentence talks about the bridge's dimensions being different from others in the city, implying a comparison of style or design.

2. The phrase to fill the blank should logically describe the bridge's style or appearance in a way that contrasts with others.

3. Let's analyze the options:
   - (a) *bleak/glowing*: These are contrasting adjectives but do not relate well to dimensions or design.
   - (b) *opulent/faded*: Opulent means luxurious, faded means worn out; these are contradictory but don't fit the context of dimensions.
   - (c) *modern/pedestrian*: "Modern" suggests contemporary design, while "pedestrian" means ordinary or dull. This pair fits well as it contrasts a unique modern style with a common one.
   - (d) *wide/narrow*: These are dimension-related but the sentence already mentions dimensions are different, so this pair is redundant.
   - (e) *sturdy/weak*: These relate to strength, not design or dimensions.

4. Therefore, the pair "modern/pedestrian" best fits the sentence contextually and grammatically.

**Answer:** (c) modern / pedestrian

Answer

Answer

Answer

Answer