**Direction:** The question below, there is a statement followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true. Then consider the 2 conclusions together and decide which of them follows beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement.

**Statement:** The Nobel Peace Prize conferred on the International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons (ICAN) is equally a recognition for the 122 countries that backed the 2017 UN treaty this summer to ban the bomb.

**Conclusions:**
I. Nobel peace prize highlights the urgent need to outlaw nuclear weapons
II. Countries do not give importance to Nobel prize

Choose the correct option:

A. Only conclusion I follows
B. Only conclusion II follows
C. Both conclusion I and II follows
D. Neither conclusion I nor II follows
E. Either conclusion I or II follows

Question

**Direction:** The question below, there is a statement followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true. Then consider the 2 conclusions together and decide which of them follows beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement.

**Statement:** The Nobel Peace Prize conferred on the International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons (ICAN) is equally a recognition for the 122 countries that backed the 2017 UN treaty this summer to ban the bomb.

**Conclusions:**  
I. Nobel peace prize highlights the urgent need to outlaw nuclear weapons  
II. Countries do not give importance to Nobel prize

Choose the correct option:

A. Only conclusion I follows  
B. Only conclusion II follows  
C. Both conclusion I and II follows  
D. Neither conclusion I nor II follows  
E. Either conclusion I or II follows

Accepted Answer

**Solution:**

1. The statement says the Nobel Peace Prize was awarded to ICAN and also recognizes the 122 countries that supported the 2017 UN treaty to ban nuclear weapons.

2. Conclusion I states that the Nobel Peace Prize highlights the urgent need to outlaw nuclear weapons. Since the prize was awarded to ICAN for their campaign to abolish nuclear weapons and recognizes countries backing the treaty, this conclusion logically follows.

3. Conclusion II states that countries do not give importance to the Nobel prize. The statement does not provide any information about the countries' attitude towards the Nobel Prize, so this conclusion does not follow.

**Answer:** Only conclusion I follows.

Answer

Answer

Answer