Dismissing four petitions challenging the collection of fines from car drivers found without masks, the Delhi High Court ruled that wearing a mask ins...

Question

Dismissing four petitions challenging the collection of fines from car drivers found without masks, the Delhi High Court ruled that wearing a mask inside a private car is mandatory even if the driver is alone, as the vehicle is considered a public place. The court described the mask as a "Suraksha Kavach" that helps prevent the spread of the deadly virus.

Which of the following can be logically inferred from the above statement?

(I) People will comply with the mask-wearing rule even when alone in their cars.

(II) The court's reference to the mask as "Suraksha Kavach" will help raise awareness among people.

(III) There will be fewer cars on Delhi roads following the High Court's verdict.

Choose the correct option:

Options

A.

Only III

B.

Only I and II

C.

Only II and III

D.

Only II

E.

All I, II & III

inferencereading comprehensionlogical reasoningmask mandatedelhi high court

Solve This Question

Get instant feedback with detailed step-by-step solution

Start Solving →