Read the following passage and answer the question: A recent study by the OED Research Center revealed a surprising difference between adults and chil...

Read the following passage and answer the question:
A recent study by the OED Research Center revealed a surprising difference between adults and children regarding practical knowledge. Unlike traditional tests focusing on aptitude and analytical skills, this study emphasized real-life problem-solving and everyday decision-making. Participants faced situations reflecting common life experiences—such as managing minor crises, interpreting emotions, and solving daily challenges. Surprisingly, although adults had higher academic qualifications, their ability to handle practical situations was lower than that of children.
Children, despite less formal education, showed remarkable insight, adaptability, and intuition. Their responses were realistic, creative, and based on observation. They approached problems with open-mindedness and curiosity—qualities that often decline in adults due to rigid educational systems. This highlighted an important distinction: qualifications do not always equal real-world competence. Adults often depend on theoretical knowledge that does not translate well into spontaneous or practical scenarios, whereas children, free from overthinking and academic pressure, tend to understand and react to reality more naturally.
The study also pointed out deeper issues in how knowledge is taught and assessed. Adults, having spent years in institutions emphasizing grades and credentials, may lose the ability to learn flexibly or think critically beyond a fixed syllabus. Conversely, children learn through experience, observation, and continuous questioning of their environment. Their learning is organic, driven by curiosity rather than the need for validation through marks or degrees.
This research challenges traditional views on intelligence and highlights the limitations of measuring competence solely through academic achievement. It suggests a need for change—in education systems and societal expectations—toward promoting experiential learning and real-world problem-solving skills. By valuing curiosity, adaptability, and practical understanding, individuals of all ages may be better prepared for life's complexities. The findings remind us that knowledge is not defined by age or education but by one’s ability to engage meaningfully with the world.

Which of the following statements can be inferred from the passage?
(I) Adults' structured thinking may limit their ability to interpret emotions in situations.
(II) The current educational system may not adequately prepare people for real-life uncertainties.
(III) The study suggests that lowering academic standards would automatically improve practical intelligence.